top of page
Post: Blog2_Post

The Self Awakened - Pragmatism Unbound

  • Writer: Maan Bayya
    Maan Bayya
  • Dec 21, 2018
  • 7 min read

* Age philosophy

The promise of freedom in a multi-faceted rules perspective, and waiver of the claim in seeing the world from the stars, and embrace the embarrassing situation of the human being, and it is struggling against the institutional structures and structures conceptual that restrict the freedom of the human being, and provide the offer of assistance to dismantle and reinvent these structures, in terms of the human being can become the greatest and most vital, in addition to making this human being less likely to mislead, nothing of all this was in a position to be enough, even pragmatism be what it is today from the angle of vision and philosophy of the times.

Pragmatism has become the philosophy of the times through the downturn, and pragmatism has turned on the hands of many of its supporters, to another image of aging disguised in the garb of wisdom, and they think they may become mature, but in fact they have fallen, and as we have lost confidence in major projects, whether those projects related to the theories or in politics, and then we became we live without it.


* Rejected Options

We wake up in a privileged world, and it is not just the natural world we inhabit and live in, it is a world of institutions and practices, including those of discursive practices, which are still prevalent around us and in all circumstances, and in any case we always recognize ourselves, whether we are members or agree with others, or sources for initiatives that structures established to organize and resist beliefs, and then who is going to be what our position is the direction of such structures of firm regulation and common beliefs? , We must give in to this organization and we are trying to extract the best of it, and exploit far as we can from it.

There is no question comes more natural, and when we think we Modernists and if in a few degree of liberation, through and beyond the immediate objectives in the pursuit of the immediate context, and there is no question comes more normal because you're thinking and after some distance from the urgent business pressure, is the same act that we do, and if the structures in our relationship that we find around us was open in spite of the resistance, and if we can differentiate between these structures and between us.

And despite the fact that access to this supreme truth requires us to pause with the self, and that should increase the speed of this vigil is usually in some crushing sorrow of the heart, and is undermining our engagement in the world of shadows and darkness, and opens the way to upgrade to see the real situation.


* Perennial philosophy, and the enemy of perennial philosophy

The standard classification of philosophical positions here, is no longer the position that we are taking the direction of the basic arrangements for the society and culture, it is a fact that the direction of the position and authority of the difference, any differences between things and people.

And in the world history of philosophy, there was a point of view prevailed to the extent that this point of view deserves give Label, And penned by (Leibniz), and is the (Perennial Philosophy), and in spite of that has rejected this view in a growing enthusiasm, the main voices in Western philosophy, and in general recipe was the philosophy of the West's opposition to the concept that was prevalent outside the West, through a lot of the traditions of thought, but should this Western opposition to find an arbitrator basis, because this opposition has never expanded rebellion against the prevailing view far enough, and there is way to determine the task of radical pragmatism, and are saying that this point of view is the view of radical (Radicalization).

And determine and the prevailing view and the point of considering the opposition, by understanding each other to the fact of change and difference, such as we encountered in the virtual world (Phenomenal), and each also includes a distinct approach the direction of policy and ethics problems, and in this sense we find that the cultural set of options within each part of the group, which is considered alternative positions on the system social and cultural prevailing in this day and age.

We have a single doctrine prevailed about the difference and presence in world history of thought, and according to the prevailing view of this, and that are apparent to the world that difference and change is not only an illusion, or in another meaning if they did not, then it is just shallow and ephemeral expression of unity the most realistic to exist, that all multi-parts (manifold), and that everything seems within it for what it is, and is different from everything else is not the absolute truth, and that the deceptive or surface feature of the difference in all multi-parts, also apply to the greatest and most important differences in the ratio to us, any differences between people, but the perennial philosophy rejects these differences, and these differences are considered misleading.

The absolute truth is a single power (Energy - Spirit - Presence), and show us the truth disguised in the form of division and difference and distinction, and in any case such defections, and culminating in the uniqueness people are secondary splits (epiphenomenal), and if this fact were not found deceptive, We remember how we meet and understand the world in the habit, and not how the world actually, and in the best case, this fact may be transient and superficial, and perhaps fail this fact in force to the essence of existence.

And according to the perennial philosophy we can gain insight into the truth, by freeing our minds and our will from the tyranny of excellence and deceptive change or change of surface or superstition or delusions or frustration that this has be putting us authoritarianism .



* The fact that the time, turning switch

- Real time

There is no more important fact because we recognize it, if we want to understand ourselves and our place in this world, the fact that time is not a trivial observation, but is a revolutionary proposal evolutionary, and is compatible with a large part of science and traditional philosophy, and in particular recipe is representing the curse of the Standing philosophy (Anathema), take perennial philosophy where the falsity of time on the basis of the doctrine of her master, and in proportion to the divine presence and ubiquity, and in proportion to the mind and to some extent the participation of the mind in such a presence, and that all the current events in the world, and according to that philosophy be simultaneous events, and there is only the existence of eternal present.

And not the perennial philosophy alone that are resisting the recognition of the fact that in time, and also the logical relations and mathematical relationships through hypotheses and evidence, if the signal these hypotheses and evidence to events that seem to fall within the time, these assumptions look like eternal assumptions, there is no evidence to time in the sports and rules, and the next after that rid ourselves of the effect of Philosophy standing, may continue in the discovery of the conspiracy against time to acknowledge the fact, and this fact rooted in the inner fortress of our mental, psychological, and social.

And in the meaning of what has not been interpreted yet, laws and phenomena may change together, and with it are not changed in a supernatural change but for some reason, and of the other if the time was the fact the fact superficial, and if it fails this fact in traffic at all stages, so be it causal interpretation must be limited in the arrival of this same interpretation to the same degree and the same sense, and in time fail causal fail, and here is controlled synchronization (Simultaneity).


* Self-consciousness - Imagine humanity

The self-concept and mind necessary, in order to alternative and sufficient supply to the perennial philosophy, must realize in the social sciences and humanities practices, if we wanted to originally realized, and if the humanitarian enlightened perspective on topics of force and possibility, and experimental, and future, are the heart of any radical pragmatism, and that the realization of this perspective in the way we use, in order to we understand who we are, and what is the situation that will champion it is that same philosophy, and we did not succeed in our cultural program, until around practices that we interpret our experience, and discuss about their chances of success.

And in our world today, social sciences and humanities dominated tendencies against such a program, and then there is an increase in the rising importance of three ways of thinking, and are the following:

1 - Human thinking - Humanization, Humanitarian thinking.

2 - Rational thinking - Rational thinking

3 - Escape from reality - Escapism.

And the previous three ways of thinking to take all of them, place an ad in a distinct range of areas, and there is a severe conflict between supporters of these ways of thinking, and in spite of all this, these methods the three work together in foolishness to disarm the imagination transgressor, and will discourage the converted (Transforming Will), and the normalization and the adaptation of this conflict through our vision for the community, so it seems that these conflicts undermine this vision, and as long as the practical struggle and ideological struggle about the conditions of social life it is selected, such as the localization indisputable will remain.

The beliefs that has become increasingly dominated, the Social Sciences and Humanities lead to a similar result, but in an indirect way, and these beliefs do so by the prosecution,In that the restrictions is flexible or semi-legal forces that form the basis of the institutions or practices, and the current forms of awareness lower than in ignoring or denying the transformational Imagine the opportunity, which of the following steps through which we thought and practice to move from here to there.


* Global Network of philosophy

In world history of philosophy, there are a small number of intellectual options that are still repeated, and in any case that the way in which it repeated part of the philosophy, which displays dealing with the whole truth it was quite different, the way in which repeated the process in dealing with social life and humanitarian act, politics, philosophy, ethics.

In the process of philosophy and ethics policy there is little intellectual positions, and which was developed from a different vocabulary, and which accounted for the bulk of its role in one of the most influential ideas, and anyway there much of what is happening or could happen and sometimes may occur in a very large speed, the conflict between philosophical positions, which may seem at first solution to the conflict, the conflict is resolved in set the direction, by guiding thought to the context of the cumulative change, instead of repeating those positions, or use the method of oscillation eternal, through the analysis of the positions of a particular point of view.


The Self Awakened

Pragmatism Unbound

Roberto Mangabeira Unger


 
 
 

Commentaires


Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

00962786420324

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2018 by Maan Bayya Educational Website. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page